Month: April 2018

Saudi Arabia held its first live, televised WWE event, the Greatest Royal Rumble. The main event for the evening was a 50-Man Royal Rumble match, the largest in the history of WWE. Additionally, the show featured some big name talent from Undertaker to John Cena to Triple H for the people of Saudi. WWE put a lot into this show, but ultimately–for WWE fans–it was one of the biggest letdowns in years.

Understandably, this was the first time the people of Saudi Arabia got to see these WWE superstars live, so of course, the sports entertainment company trotted out many of its biggest names. However, what WWE failed to realize in this scenario is that overpacking a show with big names, and a lack of storyline, makes these matches dull.

Take for example Triple H and John Cena, which opened up the entire event. Their battle was slow-paced, strategic, and not a great way to start a show. Tests of strength between two powerhouse wrestlers are fine, but shows need to kick off with excitement and have something at stake. And it didn’t work here because there were no stakes. If John Cena won, nothing happens. If Triple H won, nothing happens. The only thing the crowd could get invested in was the individual mythos of these characters, as there was no story driving the fight.

Additionally, there was Undertaker vs. Rusev in a Casket Match. Honestly, no one should have expected much from this match, and the only story building up to the event was Rusev being removed from the match then later added back on. While the almost 10-minute match lasted longer than Taker’s appearance at Wrestlemania 34, it left many fans, like myself, wondering what the point of it was. Rusev won’t continue to feud with Taker, and the match in no way made the Bulgarian Brute look tough. The match itself was fine and enjoyable, but again, what were the stakes?

Greatest Royal Rumble was a poorly put-together highlight reel of what the sports entertainment company is, mixed with a bit of WWE nostalgia. Five of the matches on the 10-match card came in at under 10 minutes, and two of those matches were five and six minutes long. What makes that crazier is that those were both title matches. These were both matches with a lot of potential that were cut too early.

And that’s a huge bummer for fans as the full-time talent involved in the majority of these matches deserves better. Even the matches with stories behind them were extremely problematic, like Roman Reigns vs. Brock Lesnar, which had a bizarre finish where Reigns should have won, but Lesnar came out victorious for some reason that was never clear. However, if you like finishing moves that don’t finish the match, Lesnar vs. Reigns is for you.

One of the true highlights of the evening came from the cruiserweight match between Cedric Alexander and Kalisto. While their match barely broke the 10-minute mark, these two men made sure that every moment of it was exciting and kept the audience on the edge of their seats. As most cruiserweight matches go, it was filled with acrobatic moments and high-risk maneuvers. The story behind the two facing each other was thinner than many fans would have liked, but overall, it was one of the standouts for the event.

Additionally, there was the four-way ladder match for the Intercontinental Championship, which featured some of the top talent in the company: Samoa Joe, Seth Rollins, The Miz, and Finn Balor. It was fun and fast-paced and had a finish that came out of nowhere, in a good way. Also, while the finish to Shinsuke Nakamura and AJ Styles was disappointing, the rest of the match was one of the best of the evening, and Nakamura plays a heel incredibly well. Both of these matches are a must-watch.

Then, there was the 50-Man Royal Rumble match, which felt exceptionally fast-paced despite being one hour and 17 minutes long. It ended with Braun Strowman as the last man standing. For his prize, he was awarded a gigantic trophy and a championship belt, two things WWE, as well as fans, will forget about two months from now. Like most Royal Rumble matches, it was fun, and there were plenty of memorable spots. But that’s not saying much when the rest of the show was mediocre and forgettable.

The real standout part of the event was Daniel Bryan in the Rumble match. It told the audience a story. It was a man who entered the match and was determined to win, against all odds, even though he was the first wrestler to enter the ring for the 50-Man event. There were numerous moments where we saw him triumph and just as many where we saw him falter. All-in-all, the odds were stacked against him, and he ended up being eliminated. And while he didn’t win the match, he spent one hour and 15 minutes inside the ring, which is a new record for most time spent in a Rumble match. Why couldn’t the rest of the event have done more things like this?

The first Greatest Royal Rumble did not live up to the enormous amount of hype WWE put behind the event. The fireworks, big names, gigantic stadium, and numerous title matches can’t cover up the fact that WWE put way too much on its plate and delivered a highly polished house show at best. Sure, there were a few moments that were great, but that was only a tiny light at the end of a long, dark tunnel.

If you’re looking to see the best the show had to offer, watch these matches and skip everything else:

• Cedric Alexander vs. Kalisto
• The Miz vs. Seth Rollins (c) vs. Finn Balor vs. Samoa Joe
• AJ Styles vs. Shinsuke Nakamura
• 50-Man Royal Rumble

For more on Greatest Royal Rumble, check out the full results for the show and some of the surprise moments that happened during the event.

The WrestleMania 34 match between Brock Lesnar and The Big Dog, Roman Reigns, was bad. The rematch in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, at the Greatest Royal Rumble, was worse. It was poor in its own right, but it also rendered the prior title match pointless.

The entire appeal of professional wrestling is that–unlike in boxing or MMA–a professional wrestling match has a predetermined pace, variety, and outcome. In boxing, you never know what you’re going to get as a paying customer; you could get a shifting battle of styles between a counter puncher and a brawler, or you could get a miserable slog, with two guys clinching and smothering each other for 12 rounds. In professional wrestling–at least in theory–the fans are guaranteed a good fight for their money; the bookers can plot out the perfect offense, defense, counterattacks, and comebacks to maximize the entertainment value.

And that’s why there’s no excuse for the awful match we saw. The Lesnar vs. Reigns match at the Greatest Royal Rumble was the one thing worse than being actively bad; it was boring. For the entire match, which took place inside a steel cage, the two men traded signature moves, special moves, and finishers. Typically, these are the trademark turning points of a match when momentum shifts and one wrestler takes the upper hand. But these were the only moves that both competitors did, over and over again. There was no grappling, no psychology, and barely any use of the steel cage that surrounded them. Why create a stipulation and then apply it so infrequently?

There were four German suplexes, two F5s, five Spears, and an endless number of Superman punches. I know this because the broadcast team kept track of these statistics and updated them as the match progressed–proof of how pervasive and played-out they were. They are no longer “signature” moves or “finishing” moves now. They are simply “moves” with no sense of danger, specialness, or purpose.

And the match’s ending was terrible too. Roman speared Lesnar through the cage, and both men hit the floor outside. And since Lesnar hit the floor first, he was declared the winner. The only problem, however, is that those aren’t the rules of the match. The winner of a steel cage match needs “both feet” to touch the floor. And Reigns, very clearly, did this before Lesnar did. There should have been a clean, non-flukey finish to pass the torch from one generation to the next. As is, this “controversy” will stretch the Lesnar vs. Reigns feud into extra, tedious innings–this time, by stirring up drama where it didn’t need to exist. WWE is getting too clever for its own good. Give fans a good, solid match, with clear stakes, a narrative arc, and clear winners. Fans will be much happier.

Wrestlemania 34 was the event where Reigns should have won the Universal Championship. Despite its predictability, it would have served a practical purpose–of putting the world title on a full-time worker who could show up to Raw every week. And it made logical, narrative sense, which is one of the reasons why it was so predictable.

Then, shockingly, Reigns lost at Wrestlemania 34. And some defenders said, “Well, maybe WWE wants the title to change hands in Saudi Arabia, where the audience response would be more pro-Reigns.” And lo and behold, it was! Saudi Arabian fans cheered for Reigns the whole match. But still, WWE stuck Reigns with another loss and rendered the Wrestlemania 34 loss even more pointless. This was no underdog narrative. This was a man getting beaten once, and then getting beaten harder.

What’s the end game to all this? In the past, Reigns had suffered from the common perception that he is the “top guy” who beats everyone else. But the current reality is worse; he’s the top guy who can’t even beat the part-time guy. And not only does that make him look weak– it makes everyone beneath him look even weaker by comparison.

For three months, Reigns has delivered multiple, passionate promos, telling the WWE fans that Lesnar’s run as Raw champion has created a worse, less consequential show. That is absolutely true. And now, rather than correcting that status quo, WWE has decided, against all reason, to maintain it.

For more on Greatest Royal Rumble, check out the full results for the show and some of the surprise moments that happened during the event.

Here are the current statuses of all the major players … and speculation on those not seen in the film.

Use this guide to complete all of Fortnite’s weekly challenges.

Be sure to visit IGN Tech for all the latest comprehensive hands-on reviews and best-of roundups. Note that if you click on one of these links to buy the product, IGN may get a share of the sale. For more, read our Terms of Use.

These days it seems like any time there’s a discussion about building a new gaming rig, the conversation inevitably turns toward graphics cards (and how expensive they’ve become). While the GPU is certainly an important part of any modern PC build, they are easy to swap out, whereas a CPU upgrade is a long-term decision since it’s usually years between upgrades, and you usually upgrade your motherboard at the same time. Your GPU selection is still the all-important one and a non-ideal CPU choice is unlikely to majorly bottleneck you, but it’s still a choice you want to get right.

Continue reading…

It’s hard not to balk at the $80 price tag on a package that contains mostly cardboard, but the bigger and more elaborate Robot Kit is a step in the right direction for Nintendo’s new kid-aimed concoction. While the Variety Kit (review) is mostly a package of fun but limited ideas, the Robot Kit shows off the goofy potential of what Labo might do with future kits with a more elaborate toy that makes its simple game a whole-body experience.

Of the two kits available at launch, the Robot Kit is by far the most complex and challenging individual Toy-Con to assemble. It takes an adult roughly four hours to build, and longer with kids pitching in. But once assembled, the clever backpack-like device contains a series of weighted cardboard bricks, each of which is tethered by a string to your hands and feet. When you extend one of your limbs, it pulls the string and hoists the brick upward, allowing the inserted Joy-Con’s IR camera to read the reflective markings on the back and send that info to the Switch to control an on-screen robot. Finally, there’s a cardboard visor strapped to your head to complete the look and add a view-switching option.

Continue reading…

Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 may see the return of the Pick 10 multiplayer system.

Treyarch teased the mode on Twitter while responding to a tweet which said “In Treyarch We Trust,” with a photo hinting at the return of Pick 10. Although the mode has not officially been announced, the development team has already promised to reveal details about the game on May 17.

We give this post a 10/10:https://t.co/itqp1CgE42

Continue reading…

Warning! Full SPOILERS follow for Avengers: Infinity War. Check out our SPOILER-FREE review right here. 

It’s no easy task to humanize a Mad Titan that wants to wipe out half of the universe’s population with the snap of his fingers, but somehow, the writers of Avengers: Infinity War found a way to make Thanos compelling.

For a studio that’s been known to produce less than stellar villains over the past 10 years, Marvel’s track record is quickly improving with its last two theatrical releases. Black Panther’s Killmonger (Michael B. Jordan) and Thanos (Josh Brolin) are positive signs that Marvel is learning how to take their antagonists’ character development seriously.

Continue reading…

SPOILERS for Avengers: Infinity War continue below, so read on at your own risk.

A large number of Marvel characters all bit it by the end of Avengers: Infinity War, but several characters actually survived and will presumably return for 2019’s untitled fourth Avengers film.

The following SPOILER-FILLED slideshow reveals every key character who is dead, alive or otherwise unaccounted for by the end of Infinity War.

For more on Avengers: Infinity War, check out our review, discover all the Easter eggs we caught, enjoy a breakdown of that post-credits reveal, and dive into our explanation of its hugely dramatic ending.

Continue reading…